Does this plan make sense? v3 - eviltoast
  • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    The Senate isn’t intended to be a representative body, it’s just two per state. They aren’t doing things like setting funding/budgets. Congress (the house of representatives) is designed to do that, though that needs some tweaking.

    • 3volver@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The Senate isn’t intended to be a representative body

      Both the house and senate vote to pass bills. The disproportionate population increases have led to less representation of citizens in more populated states.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        But the original states didn’t have balanced populations, the founders knew that, but they still set it to be two senators per state. The house is scaled by population.

        • metaldream@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          They did that for as part of a negotiation though. The less populous states refused to join the union without something like the Senate.

          To me it’s an outdated concept because states are much less independent now than they were back then. And we have a national identity that didn’t exist during the revolution.