I've noticed my boomer parents using instagram and tiktok. I can't tell you how excited I am for them to kill those platforms like they did facebook. - eviltoast
  • asyncrosaurus@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    considering how huge FB still is.

    FB is only huge because they’ve expanded all over the globe, even providing internet to developing nations to facilitate new user acquisition. In reality they’ve been bleeding the original Western users that signed up between '04-'10, and growth among new generations flatland a long time ago. There’s a reason Meta aggressively expanded to other ventures (or attempt to create platforms) like Instagram, Threads, what’s app, VR and metaverse. Metas only chance at sustainable growth and capturing young people is to build or buy platforms young people will use, because it ain’t Facebook.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Are you arbitrarily adding conditions and moving the goalposts? I said FB is huge, and that is true. Your rebuttal “only because” really doesn’t change that, if anything it reinforces it. It also doesn’t change the fact that FB hasn’t been “killed” as originally postulated.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      FB is only huge because they’ve expanded all over the globe, even providing internet to developing nations to facilitate new user acquisition

      And they only say Godzilla is huge because she can crush a tank with her foot.

      • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s horizontal growth vs vertical. Growing by getting more coverage is growth but it’s not sustainable growth that you get by getting the next generation into it.