higher wages for the servers... by the customers. Fnbs - eviltoast

Went to a restaurant in LA today and when I got the check I noticed that it was a bit higher than it should be. Then I noticed this 18% service charge. So… We, as customers, need to help pay for their servers instead of the owners paying their servers a living wage. And on top of that they have suggested tip. I called bs on this. I will bet you that the servers do not see a dime of this 18% service charge. [deleted a word so it wasn’t a grammatical horror to read]

  • Heavybell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the service charge is always there then just raise prices by 18% and stop misleading people ffs…

      • bobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        73
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because the price on the menu then appears lower than what the customer actually pays. It’s completely misleading.

        • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ohhh, that’s a really good point. I didn’t think about that. This hasn’t happened where I live. Thanks for helping me understand. That IS really misleading.

          • raptir@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            And even if it’s on their printed menu, you might look at the menu on Google Maps and see one place has a dish for $20 and another place had the same dish for $24. You go to the cheaper place and sit down and see the 18% fee. Are you necessarily going to leave and go to the other one?

            • Shush@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I would probably leave and just go home. I wouldn’t be in the mood to eat anymore.

            • aesthelete@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s usually on the menu but it’s in fine print under an asterisk.

              It’s alarmingly common (though not usually as high as 18%), and ought to be fucking illegal.

      • new_acct_who_dis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because no one agreed to pay that when they were ordering. Imagine being a on budget for a night out and getting this extra charge outta nowhere

      • IdleSheep@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Imagine you only have 10 dollars on you and buy a 9.99 item off the menu because of it, only to discover at the register there’s a 20% service fee. Not very a very pleasant customer experience, is it?

        Thank God where I live this is completely illegal. The prices on the menus are always the final price.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thank God where I live this is completely illegal. The prices on the menus are always the final price.

          ^ This is the answer folks…this type of bullshit legalese in restaurants should not be legal.

      • atticus88th@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also it costs far too much for the owner to reprint all those menus with higher prices. And to update all the food delivery apps… fuhgeddaboudit

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But they can afford to reprint the menu to include a note about the 18% service charge or when their item prices increase ‘organically?’ This is a BS excuse.

          • lad@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            My guess would be that it was sarcasm exactly because of the reason you explained. It contradicts really so hard it almost makes it obvious (not completely, it seems)

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It has nothing to do with the cost of re-printing menus, because they have to do that anyway to put the legalese on there about the percentage surcharges.