Please Stop - eviltoast
  • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Banks/hackers can manipulate data if they want to. Manipulating data on blockchains is way waaaaay harder.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      Using a blockchain to maintain their internal ledgers means they have complete control over that blockchain, so they can manipulate it all they want. Blockchains aren’t magic.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Who are “they” in the above message?

        If you trust all your employees then an internal blockchain is useless, but do banks really totally trust their employees?

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          A blockchain won’t solve incorrect transaction information any more than an audit log in this case. This is an entirely internal process controlled by the bank and access would be restricted, so they couldn’t just edit audit logs. How do you think a blockchain would be used to improve this?

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            The actions that an employee could perform would be limited by their private key’s abilities. Blockchain can be preventative. It’s not only for retrospective analysis.

            • hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              The actions that an employee could perform in any database would be limited by their account permissions. Blockchain doesn’t change this. I pointed out a retrospective mechanism because a completely internal blockchain wouldn’t prevent tampering either.

              • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                You end up with a very complex database account management.

                I agree in general. Fully internal databases should not be blockchains.

                But if external access is required at any point then there may be a blockchain use case.

                • hark@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  It’s not complicated at all. It’s basic database access management and it’s been a thing for decades without issue. If external access is required then those parties are given restricted access appropriate for their job and their actions are logged in the audit log in case any inappropriate actions were taken by them and need to be reviewed/reversed. These are solved problems and blockchain adds nothing there. The only case that blockchain helps is in a system where you have a large number of random participants and you want transactions to be enforced by work done/computing power or stake. This is why cryptocurrency has been the only practical use case for blockchain, with the word “practical” doing a lot of work, hence the diagram in the post we’re all discussing.

                  • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    If external access is required then those parties are given restricted access

                    So a human needs to get involved.

                    inappropriate actions were taken by them and need to be reviewed/reversed.

                    Lack of finality slows processes.

                    These are solved problems and blockchain adds nothing there.

                    Two improvements/use cases given above.

                    The only case that blockchain helps is in a system where you have a large number of random participants

                    I.e. Access without human authorisation

                    and you want transactions to be enforced

                    Finality.

                    This is why cryptocurrency has been the only practical use case for blockchain,

                    Supply chain tracking

                    Royalty payments

                    Renewable energy tracking

                    Ticketing

                    Etc.