Bad-At-Privacy Car Companies Now Have to Answer to the FTC - eviltoast

This is good news, hopefully the FTC actually does something.

  • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    And even before that, you have to worry about the dealership plugging one of those devices into your car and pulling the data from it, even if it’s not uploaded remotely, it could still be grabbed. I think you may have to go back to about 2000 or before to see cars that don’t have that or it’s not common or does not collect very much data at all.

    • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I think you are talking OBDII systems, and while they communicate with the ECU, that system wouldn’t need any GPS access. I don’t think it has a direct link with the cambus that would hold the more advanced data. (Which if memory serves, also doesn’t handle GPS.

      There is a dedicated port in my car specifically for data logging, but it only records realtime, not past travel. My GPS unit does track “breadcrumbs” if not following a road, but you’d have to interface directly to that computer. since there is no Bluetooth, there is no contact data or advanced privacy weaknesses.

      • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        That is likely it. I just could not remember the name of the system, but I know it has a data log port that you can connect a machine to that reads diagnostic data.