Stefen Auris@pawb.socialM to Furry Technologists@pawb.social · 9 months agoHDMI Forum Rejects Open-Source HDMI 2.1 Driver Support Sought By AMD - Phoronixwww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up1137arrow-down11file-textcross-posted to: linux@lemmy.mlhardware@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
arrow-up1136arrow-down1external-linkHDMI Forum Rejects Open-Source HDMI 2.1 Driver Support Sought By AMD - Phoronixwww.phoronix.comStefen Auris@pawb.socialM to Furry Technologists@pawb.social · 9 months agomessage-square16fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: linux@lemmy.mlhardware@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
minus-squareCris@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·9 months agoIs displayport a more open standard, or more open source friendly?
minus-squaretowerful@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up20·9 months agoDP is by VESA, who brought you such bangers as VGA, DVI, standardised mounting systems, DDC (which enables EDID), EDID. Although there is controversy about them not supplying the standards documentation for free, i dont believe it is licences
minus-squareCris@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 months agoCool, I had no idea! Very good to know ☺️
Is displayport a more open standard, or more open source friendly?
DP is by VESA, who brought you such bangers as VGA, DVI, standardised mounting systems, DDC (which enables EDID), EDID.
Although there is controversy about them not supplying the standards documentation for free, i dont believe it is licences
Cool, I had no idea! Very good to know ☺️