Arch is Easier to Use than Debian - eviltoast

So the thing with Debian and any Debian based distro like Ubuntu or Linux Mint is there is no big centralized software repo like the AUR. Yes there is the apt repository but if you want something that’s not in there, get ready to read the documentation or follow random guides.

For example, one of my friends wanted to download an audio tool called Reaper. On Windows this is just looking up the application and clicking on the .exe. It really depends on the dev if they include a .deb, sometimes you might need to download the .sh file or they may tell you to compile it yourself. Perhaps, you have to add a ppa. On Arch, all I have to do is Paru -S Reaper, if there are multiple Reapers I can look for that by typing Paru Reaper.

Now that Arch is so easy to install with the Archscript, and the software repo so vast and easy to use, is Debian really user friendly if you have to jump through several hoops to download programs?

Edit: yeah yeah there’s flathub and stuff but that’s more of a last resort, optimally, you want to get it the correct way.

  • Handles@leminal.spaceEnglish
    33·
    8 months ago

    I’m not touching flatpaks or snaps with a ten foot pole, and I have the same experience as you. Switched to EndeavourOS a few years back after having been a Debian (and Synaptic) advocate for almost 10 years.

    The AUR is great, and the Arch wiki is a flipping treasure trove. I can hardly imagine going back, certainly not on my work station. Servers will probably be fine running Debian for another few years.

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.eeOP
        1·
        8 months ago

        For certain low level applications, flathab may not work but for most cases, flathub is fine.

        The second scenario is for something not even in flathub but is available in the aur which is signal desktop beta. The other day I installed this by typing paru signal and scrolled up and found signal desktop beta right there and pressed the appropriate number to install. This is much more efficient to install. If I were on my friend’s linux mint computer I would have to find the github and follow instructions to manually add the package.

        I am comfortable doing both methods but my point is that users generally want the lowest resistance to new technology. Linux is supposed to be efficient and easy to use not having to look up guides when the Windows way is downloading and running a simple .exe.

      • Handles@leminal.spaceEnglish
        1·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, slow app launch for one thing. Lack of DE integration for another. Flatpak apps are so completely foreign elements in the distros I’ve used that I have no inclination to use them.

        And the few times I’ve had to use on, it’s so bloated with redundant dependencies. I understand that flatpak apps will share dependencies within their ecosystem(?) but since they’re the exception to the rule on my system it never becomes a benefit.

        Besides, as is OP’s point — I have the entirety of the AUR at my fingertips. Why would I bother with anything else?