White House: Future Software Should Be Memory Safe - eviltoast

On the one side I really like c and c++ because they’re fun and have great performance; they don’t feel like your fighting the language and let me feel sort of creative in the way I do things(compared with something like Rust or Swift).

On the other hand, when weighing one’s feelings against the common good, I guess it’s not really a contest. Plus I suspect a lot of my annoyance with languages like rust stems from not being as familiar with the paradigm. What do you all think?

  • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    It’s mind-boggling how hard it is to make basic things work

    It’s mind-boggling how broken basic things are.

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I have not encountered anything broken, aside from maybe binary app docstring stuff (e.g., automated example testing).

      On the contrary, everything seems precise, reliable, and trustworthy. That’s the thing to really like about Rust – you can be pretty much fearless in it. It’s just difficult. I die a bit in time any time I have a return type that looks like Box<dyn Fn(&str) -> Result<Vec<String>, CustomError>> or some shit . Honestly, the worst thing about Rust is probably that you have to manually specify heap vs stack when the compiler could easily make those determinations itself 99% of the time based on whether something is sized.