UK Labour are too Tory for me. - eviltoast

UK Labour are too Tory for me.
I’ve threatened that they’ve lost my vote. (edit)
On LGBTQIA, specifically trans rights.
On their plans for the NHS.
On their plans for health and wealth inequalities in the UK.
On their plans for the relationship the UK has with Europe.
They have to be less Tory to get my vote back.
It’s not acceptable that to not vote Tory, we have to settle for what they offer. They assume their position is acceptable.
If they correct their position, I’ll reconsider
@uk_politics

    • noodle@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank you! It’s actually worrying how much people seem to be basing their idea of what party policy will be on soundbites they’ve heard.

      This country is in dire need of some political literacy. Thinking that the Tories and Lib Dems are somehow better on LGBQT issues than Labour would be hilarious if it wasn’t a damning indictment of the intelligence of British voters.

    • Colin@med-mastodon.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      @frankPodmore Unfortunately the pay wall prevents others from seeing this. I’ve read the entire article via the link given and it doesn’t address several of my points, so I’m not clear which policy positions you’re referring to.
      In fact the opening paragraph agrees with me:
      “It has been said that in sidelining the Labour party’s Corbynite left wing and manoeuvring it towards the centre, Sir Keir Starmer has made the UK opposition barely distinguishable in tone from the governing Conservatives.”

      • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, it doesn’t agree with you. Really basic reading comprehension error, there. It says people have said that, not that it is true. It spends the following 600 words demolishing that case.

      • noodle@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Paywalls are easily circumvented. This isn’t a good excuse.

        For the uninitiated; Copy the article address and paste it into the search bar on archive.is. There are multiple paywall bypass methods, this is just one.

        • Colin@med-mastodon.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          @noodle As I said I’ve read it, via a different method to you, but thanks for sharing it.
          Now other readers will be aware of a strategy. Not all strategies work so people may have to try more than one. In any case it’s an inadequate article.

          • noodle@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            You responded within 1 minute of it being posted and then dismissed it for being too long, which it isn’t. Anything less than 1500 words should take you about 5 minutes to read. That’s not much of a commitment.

    • Colin@med-mastodon.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      @frankPodmore My characterisation is broad and lacking detail, mostly for word count. There are other policies I’ve not detailed either.
      As I’ve said elsewhere, my voicing my opinion to Labour and other left parties is as important as my vote.

      • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That is definitely less important than your vote. Also, I’m unconvinced you’ve read the article in the time you’ve had since I posted it.

        EDIT: Why have you replied in so many different comments? I can’t follow your argument if it’s spread out like this!

    • Colin@med-mastodon.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      @frankPodmore I have rooted my behaviour in reality by telling them what I want. Additionally, I also have the absolute right to change my mind as many times as I wish and to vote tactically, come the GE dependent on the facts available at the time.
      We should all be able to make on the spot decisions based on the available data and only rely on heuristics if the data isn’t available.
      What I tell them and what I do, are not Labour’s concern.

      • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Your description of what you want is virtually value-free, because it’s framed entirely negatively. It sounds like you want ‘not the Tories’. The article makes the case that Labour are ‘not the Tories’, as does history and, frankly, common sense.

        • Colin@med-mastodon.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          @frankPodmore The article in it’s just over 600 words does barely anything to answer my points.
          The value is again, that I choose to tell Labour what it is I want from them. Recall that I’ve not shared the email with you, so you have no way of knowing.
          It isn’t a simple dichotomy. I choose to tell Labour what I want from them. There are many varieties of not Tory and labour can choose to be Tory lite, or not. How I vote and what I tell them can align or not as I see fit.

          • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I mean, again, your points are ‘Labour are too much like the Tories’ and the article is about numerous ways in which Labour are, in fact, not like the Tories.

            • NattyNatty2x4@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Dude’s just trying to make another “both sides” argument. Always funny how people pretending that both sides are the same do so in a way that conflates the further-left party with the further-right party, and not the other way around. Almost like it’s conservatives pretending to be to the left…

              • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah, they’re always only a hop and a skip from voting Lib Dem. And from there, it’s just one jump to ‘Might as well vote Tory…!’