Is there a more politically conservative part of the fediverse? - eviltoast

I’m a conservative. I don’t mind the liberal stuff here. It’s good to learn the other side, but I don’t want a liberal echo chamber. I’d like to be more politically balanced in the fediverse. Is there any way I can do that?

  • maporita@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t speak for the the person you replied to but I get my information from a variety of sources. One is the Economist magazine, (hardly a right wing tabloid). In a recent op-ed John McWhorter, who is a professor of English and comparative literature at Columbia University, and the author of more than a dozen books, and who also happens to be black, Mr McWhorter laments that CRT has “painted black Americans as hypersensitive children, immune to reason and indifferent to nuance”. He goes on to say that “Whites insist this is progress in order to feel unracist. Black people (although hardly in the lockstep many suppose) insist this is progress because it lends them a useful “noble victim” status. The result is a chronic, pervasive mendacity, dehumanising black people as thoroughly as outright bigotry did, despite being presented as respect and even worship.”.

    You may disagree with Mr McWhorter. I certainly do. But for you to so casually dismiss another person as an gnorant, fox news dummy simply because they have different views tells us more about you than about them.

    • Falmarri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So that just tells us that McWhorter doesn’t know what CRT is either apparently

      • maporita@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m pretty sure that he does know what it is. As I said I don’t agree with many of his arguments, but they are nonetheless cogent and reasoned arguments.

        He claims for example that CRT proponents are mostly white liberal elites who just want to demonstrate their anti-racist credentials. He also makes the point that CRT ultimately harms blacks and people of color by implicitly lowering standards for those groups. The “soft racism of low expectations”. These are valid criticisms.

        Instead of dismissing him as ignorant, (as so many of us liberals often do), it’s better to engage and try to refute what he claims.