Yahoo lays off the leaders of Engadget - eviltoast
  • pop@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Well, almost everyone blocks ads so this is the next iteration. Anyone with a few braincells saw this coming. In the future, the only way you’re going to get actual/verifiable/trustworthy news is by paying for it. Like the good ol’ times.

    Who knew journalism is an actual job? not me. I want every website to be free.

    The freely available ones are going to run by the rich to peddle ads and propaganda (yes they do it already but there are still free press floating around asking for donations, which will eventually dry out). The poor will be misled with mis-information and clickbaits and people will wonder why shitheads are getting elected everywhere.

    Bots will be posting these on every social media (federated or not) and the freeloaders and “no advertisements ever” crowd that never contribute anything to a sustainable internet with free and accessible information for all will be complaining about “enshittification” all day long.

    Thank you for coming to my TED Talk. Like and subscribe. And don’t forget to hit that bell button. Thanks for our sponsors at Raid: Legends for sponsoring this text. Read the non shitty, ad-free version at our patreon.

    • nymwit@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m with you. Ads are annoying but I sort of wish there was (maybe just more around here?) acknowledgement of that’s just how the service gets paid for. I don’t adblock anything. If I can’t stand the ads I don’t use it. I just ignore them. Maybe I’m old and grew up with broadcast tv. I’d rather be subjected to internet ads than have to pay (real currency) at every site I go to. Folks can Adblock all they want but I don’t see how that’s any better than corpo short term quarterly earning thinking vs long term wide range impacts consideration.