So, what gun control would have stopped the Kansas City shooting? - eviltoast
  • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Fully automatic systems are regulated in the United States at the federal level.

    I understand how federalism works, evidently that skill escapes you.

    You can legally own a fully automatic gun in the U.S., unlike Germany. Even your cherypicked point is wrong.

    Still, how would any of these changed the Kansas City shooting?

    I’ve already answered this, and the answer went sailing over your head.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      Then clarify as I don’t see how how any of this would have stopped the shooting.

      Your chart was wrong and I called it out. Are you intentionally posting false information since you knew it was wrong ?

      You realize gun control really started during Nazi germany to keep the Jews from defend themselves. After the war it was the allies who stripped away most the gun rights to keep the population from attacking the allies.

      • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Then clarify as I don’t see how how any of this would have stopped the shooting.

        Nah, you’re not worth the effort. You’d just find a new way to side step the meaning of what I am saying.

        Your chart was wrong and I called it out. Are you intentionally posting false information since you knew it was wrong ?

        I just explained why it isn’t.

        You realize gun control really started during Nazi germany to keep the Jews from defend themselves.

        And this country was founded on the blood of the natives, and built by slaves. So what?

        • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          9 months ago

          Nah, you’re not worth the effort. You’d just find a new way to side step the meaning of what I am saying.

          and this is why people see you as a troll. You don’t want to have discussions. You just want to throw insults.

          • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            You don’t want to have discussions.

            Not with you. But I am happy to point out the bullshit.

            You just want to throw insults.

            No, I’d much prefer it if there was no need. But the mod team around here is impotent to maintain civility, and so invariably conversations around here end in insults. I don’t go starting shit. But I sure as shit am not going to sit around idly in the face of insults.

            Also, this you? Get off your high horse.