which linux phone is the most promising? - eviltoast

I want to donate to a linux phone. I believe in linux and I want a linux phone. Maybe we can use one in very few years as a normal daily driver. It’s getting closer and closer every month.

I want to donate that we get there sooner. But which project? I’m following postmarket but I’m not sure if they are the most promising. What’s your stance on this? To which project would you give your money to accellerate it?

Edit: I don’t want to buy a phone. I want to support the phone os devs. Sorry for the bad wording.

  • dragnet@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    42·
    9 months ago

    Almost everything you said here is false, with the exception of controversy over the developer. However, GrapeheneOS is far from a single developer project, and the former lead stepped down a little while ago.

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      44·
      9 months ago

      Well, I do not know, I just back up things with a bunch of quoting and hard evidence, and on top of it I am pretty self-critical as a leftist, so I feel fairly confident in my takes.

      “Stepped down” is a big fat lie if anyone bothered to look at GitHub for GrapheneOS project, with just one person pushing commits to the project. From what I showed with DivestOS developer bullying incident, it is also proven that this is not a truly open source project, but one licensed depending on Micay’s personal whims. There is no freedom in his code licensing and can go ahead to do shitty things like falsely accusing FlorisBoard and Bromite devs of being neonazis on GitHub issue trackers.

      Edit: since this clown calls me “misinformation” spreader and asks for evidence, it is easy to look at one of the two long investigation articles I wrote, in which in share DivestOS XMPP room chat logs with Micay bullying DivestOS dev into banning me otherwise he will initiate a harassment campaign on social media against him. Similar stuff was done (calling neonazi in issue tracker) against Bromite project that used what should be open sourced code, but is not.

      • scratchandgame@lemmy.mlTiếng Việt
        22·
        9 months ago

        There is no freedom in his code licensing

        Evidence required.

        Most of them grant infinite freedom, with one requirement. (Not restrictive like *GPL.)

        Others like vanadium are restrictive under GPL

        https://github.com/GrapheneOS/hardened_malloc/commit/c3a580727a9a844da05ae4e2787a937253b09427

        You guys should not listen to TheAnonymouseJoker, this is the evidence of him spreading misinformation.

        (Please note I’m not in GrapheneOS community (banned), nor putting myself in the class of privacy racers.)

      • scratchandgame@lemmy.mlTiếng Việt
        11·
        9 months ago

        Edit: since this clown calls me “misinformation” spreader and asks for evidence, it is easy to look at one of the two long investigation articles I wrote, in which in share DivestOS XMPP room chat logs with Micay bullying DivestOS dev into banning me otherwise he will initiate a harassment campaign on social media against him.

        Don’t think that’s related

        Similar stuff was done (calling neonazi in issue tracker) against Bromite project that used what should be open sourced code, but is not.

        https://twitter.com/GrapheneOS/status/1537851090514890752

        That’s personal emotion against bromite and lead to unacceptable wording. But Micay can’t force others to remove their code if they do not violate it. nevertheless, Vanadium code is free in Linux communities’ opinion, right?? (I’d not consider that since it is GPL)

        simply: The license of vanadium is still gpl and is it free in your opinion?