English may be a hot mess but at least we don't have to worry about this nonsense - eviltoast
  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yeah I don’t see anyone accepting being called “it” in English; that’s how you refer to farm animals bound for slaughter or undesirable ethnicities you’re going to exterminate.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Why would anyone ever want to try using “it” for people in English unless they’re purposefully trying to demean someone… ?

      Sorry, I wasn’t trying to say that’s what English should do. I was describing what Finnish does.

      I’m pointing out that lots of languages have less gender distinctions than English, so English calling French out on gendered nouns is rather silly.

      My point is that despite Finland having a perfectly good third person singular for people, we usually use the even more general one, which is just for anything. Except when talking to and about pets, because then somehow everyone uses less colloquial language.

      While English has a perfectly good second person singular, but doesn’t even use it anymore.

      You can’t have more third person singulars before you finish your second person singulars, that’s the rule. Now open up!

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thou

      • ahnesampo@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        My point is that despite Finland having a perfectly good third person singular for people we usually use the even more general one

        The reason for that is because “se” as strictly a “thing” pronoun is artificial “book language”. When standard literary Finnish was being developed in the 19th century, its inventors wanted to have a person/thing distinction in pronouns like the “civilized” languages had, so they arbitrarily assigned “hän” as a person pronoun and “se” as a thing pronoun. That distinction is artificial, and has never stuck in spoken Finnish.

        Originally there was a difference between “hän” and “se”, but it was grammatical: se was the general third person pronoun, hän referred back to the speaker (logophoric pronoun). Compare:

        • Antti sanoi, että se tulee. (Antti said that someone else will come.)
        • Antti sanoi, että hän tulee. (Antti said that he himself will come.)