true comparison - eviltoast

A picture of Lara Croft in new Tomb Raider hand in hand with Lara Croft from the old Tomb raider Series. The new one labeled GNOME and the old one KDE.

    • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Imo they are both solid technologically, but KDE delivers much more with it’s defaults. Obviously you can theme both to hell and back and make them look however you want and get whatever functionality you want, but default KDE is so much more usable than default gnome it’s not even a competition.

        • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is it? Gnome loads in a ton of services and feels pretty bloated to me. I don’t notice that it’s any lighter than KDE, and it often feels more sluggish.

          But, they’re both desktops and are loading in a bunch of stuff whether you use it or not, so you’re right that they’re pretty comparable.

        • havokdj@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Plasma itself isn’t bloated, it is only bloated if you install the entire suite of KDE applications. Installing plasma by itself doesn’t require that many dependencies.

          GNOME has a similar level of optionals for their desktop environment as well, you’re just expected to actually INSTALL them.

        • happyhippo@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          KDE uses less RAM, you can fact check quite easily.

          Depending on the distro it ships with more or less stuff, but a few games, an office suite, media players for audio/video and in some cases a partition manager, are all necessary tools in any setup, at least in my book.

          I don’t see the bloat.