Wyze says camera breach let 13,000 customers briefly see into other people’s homes - eviltoast
    • Patches@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      To be clear you block internet access at your router. Do not trust the camera not to phone home.

      Depending on your router - this is either very difficult, or a single click but I’ve never seen it be impossible.

    • Stegget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      You are correct. But to be totally honest, Wyze offered an affordable cost and a low barrier to entry. It’s a tradeoff that worked out for me, but I get that it’s not the same math for everyone else.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        There are onvif cameras (IP camera standard that lets it work with any software) that are as cheap as Wyze. Plus many have microsd so they can work without any network.

        • Stegget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Again you’re completely right. I’m just saying that when it comes down to it, 99% of folks are not going to host their own system. And in my personal, specific case, I judged the rewards to heavily outweigh the risks, which ended up being correct. YMMV.