Yeah I think that the white monarchist government of my country is illegitimate and that ownership of the land should be returned to the indigenous people. If the white people don’t like it they can go back to England
Also since the government is illegitimate, cops are actually occupying soldiers and killing them is ethically A-okay.
the intentional destruction of a people’s civilization/government
slavery
to
the people trying to escape said destruction/lingering impacts
the people moving to our nations for the hope of working for a better life, who have lower crime rates than the existing population, and are a net boon to the economy
It is beyond ridiculous, and a miscarriage of history.
They’re for all intents the same. Ask the native Americans if there was a difference between the colonizers and when we formed a nation with immigrants
Indians and some Chinese technically are not immigrants to the UK. If they are part of the commonwealth, they can move to other commonwealth states.
It’s similar to Puerto Rico and America but slightly different.
It’s why there are so many Jamaicans in the UK. They are part is the commonwealth
Yeah I think that the white monarchist government of my country is illegitimate and that ownership of the land should be returned to the indigenous people. If the white people don’t like it they can go back to England
Also since the government is illegitimate, cops are actually occupying soldiers and killing them is ethically A-okay.
Cool, cool. How do you feel about Indians and Chinese (as in the subcontinent) in Britian?
How about Syrians in Sweden?
Do you honestly believe it is logical to equate colonialism to immigration?
Yes actually. Why wouldnt they be the same thing?
You must not be very familiar with the impacts of colonialism then. Take your time and read these:
https://www.currentaffairs.org/2017/09/a-quick-reminder-of-why-colonialism-was-bad
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/current-affairs-magazine/
https://plato.stanford.edu/Entries/Colonialism/
Equating the two is laughable. You are equating
conquest
the intentional destruction of a people’s civilization/government
slavery
to
the people trying to escape said destruction/lingering impacts
the people moving to our nations for the hope of working for a better life, who have lower crime rates than the existing population, and are a net boon to the economy
It is beyond ridiculous, and a miscarriage of history.
Removed by mod
Because colonizer is an edge lord word.
They’re for all intents the same. Ask the native Americans if there was a difference between the colonizers and when we formed a nation with immigrants
___ is left of center right, so it is [dismissive label].
Thank you edge lord.
Now can you answer the question or are you just going to do you same MO?
It’s really inspiring that you’re resorting to insults immediately after becoming a mod.
Can you answer the question or not?
Indians and some Chinese technically are not immigrants to the UK. If they are part of the commonwealth, they can move to other commonwealth states. It’s similar to Puerto Rico and America but slightly different.
It’s why there are so many Jamaicans in the UK. They are part is the commonwealth