Why aren't more people using NixPKGs? - eviltoast

Distro agnostic packages like flatpaks and appimages have become extremely popular over the past few years, yet they seem to get a lot of dirt thrown on them because they are super bloated (since they bring all their dependencies with them).

NixPkgs are also distro agnostic, but they are about as light as regular system packages (.deb/.rpm/.PKG) all the while having an impressive 80 000 packages in their repos.

I don’t get why more people aren’t using them, sure they do need some tweaking but so do flatpaks, my main theory is that there are no graphical installer for them and the CLI installer is lacking (no progress bar, no ETA, strange syntax) I’m also scared that there is a downside to them I dont know about.

  • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
    72·
    9 months ago

    Inate complexity that keeps moving as they introduce things like flakes.

    Flakes solve the problem of reproducibility for which nixpkgs (or other external input) revision to use (e.g. in a software project). The main thing they bring is a npm-like lock file and a predictable interface. You don’t have to use them if you don’t want that.

    Its a declarative configuration management system as package manager.

    No it isn’t. That’s NixOS, which is another thing built on top of Nix and nixpkgs. nixpkgs is first and foremost a package collection.