The extension shinigami eyes is back. - eviltoast

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/15541577

The extension shinigami eyes is back.

Quick context: the extension allows you to see which profiles are supportive or transphobic and it wasn’t updated for 2 years.

I was worried it was abandoned. Hopefully we can get Ecosia and Lemmy supported and have it expanded it to cover racist/sexist profiles soon. I would like to donate to the developer if I could.

It is my favourite Firefox extension because it would protect you from seeing all the hate online and prevent unintentionally supporting a slimy transphobe😡 and it literally reveals to you people’s true colours.

2/10/2024

*support for blue sky *updated bloom filter *Fix colonization of Tumblr tags

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    24·
    9 months ago

    1. This isn’t a moderation tool, it’s effectively a communal way to remember usernames of people who’ve been abusive. Do you have the same worry about people blocking you for your past views? I’ve said awful, transphobic, homophobic, and racist things under past usernames (part of the reason I switched to Starman was to distance myself from the persona I had 15 years ago), and I’m sure some people rightfully blocked me when they saw those comments. Personally I would rather someone see a red username over a comment now that I’m an ally than not see my comment at all.

    2. Like I said, they are strict. Unless you are unabashedly transphobic, you won’t even accidentally say something that might get you tagged. Kind of like how a white person doesn’t accidentally use racial slurs unless they’re racist. You shouldn’t have to worry about a video of you calling someone the n word going viral because you shouldn’t be calling people the n word in the first place.

    • phdepressed@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      31·
      9 months ago

      They are strict now, the slippery slope argument is that it won’t stay that way. We’ve seen mod tools similar to this make mistakes. Twitch, Tumblr, YouTube, Facebook, etc all have algorithm analysis for moderation purposes and all of them have messed up and require additional human review.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        21·
        9 months ago

        From their website:

        Is there a mechanism in place to prevent malicious/fake reports?

        Yes. While your overrides are immediately visible to you, changes are included in the publicly visible dataset only if they pass some trustworthiness criteria (including human validation).

        I see no reason to believe that the human review criteria is going anywhere