Wi-Fi jamming to knock out cameras suspected in nine Minnesota burglaries -- smart security systems vulnerable as tech becomes cheaper and easier to acquire - eviltoast
  • Fallenwout@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Isn’t this easily detectable?

    The camera sends a ping every 30sec to the host. Missing ping: sound silent alarm with possible tampering. Missing 4 pings, let all hell break loose alarm sound.

    That is how my sensors work. They work on 433/868mhz, this is open band and easy to flood. If the hub misses a ping from a sensor, the tamper protection alarm goes of.

    • Lightfire228@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 months ago

      I feel like that would cause false positives

      Then again, not that many people mess with their router

      • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        9 months ago

        If I got an alarm every time a 433 sensor didn’t check in for 10 minutes, I’d never get any sleep!

      • datelmd5sum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        fucking wasps cause 100x more false alarms than network issues for me. I need a neural net or something that can differentiate between a wasp and a human.

    • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      I mean if you really care about security you’re not using wifi… you’re going hard wired. Wifi can be messed up by your neighbors unintentionally and then there goes your tampering alarm. Tampering alarms are good when the system isn’t fragile.

      No security installer is going to suggest wifi if someone’s genuinely concerned about security.