I'd like to get away from "arch bad for new users" - eviltoast

When I say arch I mean the arch distro and all of its offspring.

Endeavouros

Arch-gui

Manjaro

Artix --maybe not though

My first enjoyable distro was manjaro, the manjaro element less so but using arch clicked for me. But even so if my first experience was using arch and archinstall then yes its not the easiest but its also not that difficult, arch is treated like a boss battle in darksouls.

So when a pre configured GUI arch is recommend I would like to see less scar mongering.

  • anamethatisnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I agree that the descriptors have to change. It’s insulting to linux beginners when you assume they’re illiterate non-it users that can’t read the paragraph explaining the install options.

    • ian@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      But, for a non IT person, installing Linux, using the typical GUI tools is not specially hard to do. Write an ISO to a USB stick. Boot the PC. Answer the installer questions like language etc. And if something doesn’t work, try a different distro. The problems come when people suggest users use unfamiliar UIs, such as the command line or fiddling with config files, where, if you don’t know the exact magic words, it fails to work.

      • anamethatisnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        While a linux beginner who’s been developing apps in proprietary microsoft systems for 20 years might be looking for an OS that’s easy to manage from CLI.

        • ian@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Yes. Then the newb is typically happy to learn the Arch ways. Showing that “arch bad for new users” is a bad choice of words.