The White House wants to 'cryptographically verify' videos of Joe Biden so viewers don't mistake them for AI deepfakes - eviltoast

The White House wants to ‘cryptographically verify’ videos of Joe Biden so viewers don’t mistake them for AI deepfakes::Biden’s AI advisor Ben Buchanan said a method of clearly verifying White House releases is “in the works.”

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Idk, making CP where a child is raped vs making CP where no children are involved seem on very different levels of bad to me.

    Both utterly repulsive, but certainly not exactly the same.

    One has a non-consenting child being abused, a child that will likely carry the scars of that for a long time, the other doesn’t. One is worse than the other.

    E: do the downvoters like… not care about child sexual assault/rape or something? Raping a child and taking pictures of it is very obviously worse than putting parameters into an AI image generator. Both are vile. One is worse. Saying they’re equally bad is attributing zero harm to the actual assaulting children part.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Man imagine trying to make the case for Ethical Child Rape Material.

      You are not going to get anywhere with this line of discussion, stop now before you say something that deservedly puts you on a watchlist.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I’m not making the case for that at all, and I find you attempting to make out that I am into child porn a disgusting debate tactic.

        “Anybody who disagrees with my take is a paedophile” is such a poor argument and serves only to shut down discussion.

        It’s very obviously not what I’m saying, and anybody with any reading comprehension at all can see that plainly.

        You’ll notice I called it “utterly repulsive” in my comment - does that sound like the words of a child porn advocate?

        The fact that you apparently don’t care at all about the child suffering side of it is quite troubling. If a child is harmed in its creation, then that’s obviously worse than some creepy fuck drawing loli in Inkscape or typing parameters into an AI image generator. I can’t believe this is even a discussion.