Poignant post on the state of things - eviltoast
  • hanekam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s a need in that it’s programmed into your biology, and most people can’t thrive without it. Surveys of middle-aged people find about 1 in 5 are child-free. Out of those, about 1 in 10 are so by choice. That leaves 49 in 50 that either have or wished, but couldn’t have, children.

    • DM_Gold@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      That ratio seems off? 49 out of 50 people wished they could have children? I highly doubt that. If going by your logic you say that 1/10th of 1/5th of folks are child free not by choice. Say out of 50 people that math equals 1 person per 50 folks regret not being able to have kids.

      • hanekam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        No. Out of 50 that’s 40 who had kids, 9 who didn’t and regret it, and just 1 who didn’t and are content.

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s a need in that it’s programmed into your biology, and most people can’t thrive without it.

      That’s not what survival need means.

      That leaves 49 in 50 that either have or wished, but couldn’t have, children.

      Again, this doesn’t make it a survival need.