Dungeons & Dragons Publisher Denies Selling Game To Chinese Firm: Here’s What To Know [was: Hasbro Seeks to Sell IP “DND” and Has Had Preliminary Contact with Tencent] - eviltoast
    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Sure, but that doesn’t mean we can’t complain about the directions the fluid is flowing. In this case a specialized term for something that didn’t previously have a popular term describing it has been rapidly diluted to mean “bad change I don’t like.” So that thing doesn’t have a specialized term any more, which hampers discourse.

      • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        The perils of language in the modern age, most people are not smart, and once a new word gets popular enough the majority of people using it will resemble the majority of society, ie, not smart people.

      • Kichae@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The thing is, “enshitification” was never defined as “abusing their business customers to claw back all the value for themselves”. That’s merely one of the stages that Doctorow outlined as part of the enshitification process.

        Enshitification, as a whole, is the process of stripping value from a product or service from everyone except for shareholders.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s a specific process, though. It’s the pattern of decreasing quality of online platforms that act as two-sided markets. Dungeons and Dragons doesn’t have that sort of structure, and that’s not the sort of quality decrease that the people who are using “enshittification” are talking about.