Atomic bombing of Japan was NOT necessary to end WWII. US gov't documents admit it - eviltoast

‘US government documents admit that the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not necessary to end WWII. Japan was on the verge of surrendering. The nuclear attack was the first strike in Washington’s Cold War on the Soviet Union. Ben Norton reviews the historical record.’

  • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    At that time the US wasn’t accepting anything less than unconditional surrender. The US changed their minds on that when the Soviets invaded.

    It’s messy for sure, probably one of the most eventful weeks in human history, so I’m sure there was a lot of back and forth. The pressure to surrender to the US came after they rejected Japan’s first surrender offer and after the Soviet liberation of Manchuria.

      • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh right, I don’t disagree with you there. Turns out tiny paragraphs aren’t very good at establishing the nuance of a complicated historical event. (and I probably wasn’t very good at getting my point across)

        • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          yep, the fact that even brief summaries have to cover things day by day during that period are a testament to that. I have no clue how skullboi covered it in just 2 hours.

          • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, going through this thread has reminded me to watch that video again. And his Harry Potter one. Not related to this topic, I just really like his casual destruction of TERF bullshit.