kurumin@linux.community to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 11 months agoLazarus hackers now push Linux malware via fake job offerswww.bleepingcomputer.comexternal-linkmessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1173arrow-down13cross-posted to: linux@sopuli.xyzlinux@feddit.de
arrow-up1170arrow-down1external-linkLazarus hackers now push Linux malware via fake job offerswww.bleepingcomputer.comkurumin@linux.community to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square28fedilinkcross-posted to: linux@sopuli.xyzlinux@feddit.de
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-211 months agoZip too? I thought only on Windows, while tar retains unix permissions.
minus-squareRustmilian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-211 months agoAll archive formats do it, afaik.
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoBut i’m sure there was an issue somewhile ago, because zip only preserves Windows permissions…
minus-squareRustmilian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-211 months agoThere’s a bunch of zip implementations(Info-Zip, Gzip, 7-Zip, PKZip, Pigz, etc.), so perhaps an older version of one of the implementations didn’t support preserving the Linux executable permission in the past.
Zip too? I thought only on Windows, while tar retains unix permissions.
All archive formats do it, afaik.
But i’m sure there was an issue somewhile ago, because zip only preserves Windows permissions…
There’s a bunch of zip implementations(Info-Zip, Gzip, 7-Zip, PKZip, Pigz, etc.), so perhaps an older version of one of the implementations didn’t support preserving the Linux executable permission in the past.