Why do we have right-on-red, and is it time to get rid of it? - eviltoast
  • Weslee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Isn’t that part of the job of the lights in the first place, to give everyone their own “timeslot” they can cross safely with?

    I’m from the UK, we don’t have anything like this, I’m not 100% sure I know exactly how it works, but it seems pretty dangerous to me.

    I can imagine a busy 6 lane intersection with filled lanes and crossing Peds going in all directions, you’re just asking for an accident

    • Shazbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s not that difficult, but bad drivers make it difficult for everyone else. Coming to a complete stop should be instinct, it’s a red light after all. But some still treat it like a green because of right on red. They’ll turn up to 24 kph so long as they don’t see obstacles at a glance. This is the danger for pedestrians and oncoming traffic, everything is secondary to the bad driver’s intention. Add the popularity of bigger vehicles which increase the likelihood of fatal crashes and reduce curb visibility, it can be pretty dicey.

      Ideally I’d like to see stronger enforcement for full stop on red. But if we can’t get bad drivers to change I’ll take sitting at the red over an accident any day.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        If full stop on red isn’t enforced what makes you think no right on red would be either?

        Unless you’re running someone over the cops don’t care.