Meta faces another EU privacy challenge over 'pay for privacy' consent choice - eviltoast
  • bassomitron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    The insane cost is telling how much money they make off of our data. I’ve always been an advocate for consensual and paid data mining. As in, let me opt into being spied on in exchange for a monthly check based on whichever broker paid for my info. I know it’s all lumped into huge datasets where separating it out in a safe, secure manner would be next to impossible, but a man can dream.

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I personally don’t think that it reflects any value as such. I am pretty sure though, that they don’t want it to be a viable option for users to pick, thereby forcing us to accept tracking and targeted ads. Actually, looking deeper into the subscription purchase window, they offer to stop showing ads, but will still show content from commercial accounts as recommended content. So although you may not see an actual ad, if you pay, you will still be shows commercial content, if META feels that it is rellevant to your behaviour