Faster than ever: Wi-Fi 7 standard arrives - eviltoast
How fast do you want your Wi-Fi to go? How does 5.8 Gigabits per second sound? Fast enough for you?

Faster than ever: Wi-Fi 7 standard arrives::How fast do you want your Wi-Fi to go? How does 5.8 Gigabits per second sound? Fast enough for you?

    • effward@lemmy.worldEnglish
      132·
      1 year ago

      And the external wireless data transfer pack can be connected to the camera by a long thin piece of metal. Maybe we could call it a “cord”. And why stop there, it could be disconnected from the camera when you’re not transferring data.

      • fidodo@lemmy.worldEnglish
        22·
        1 year ago

        Having a pack in your pocket is far better than being tethered to an object with a cord that you can trip on and obstruct your movement. Come on dude, do I really need to explain this? I think you’re being purposefully obtuse for some reason. Do you want to have discussions here or make bluntly snarky remarks that don’t really make sense? Is that really the culture you want to propagate on lemmy?

        • effward@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          1 year ago

          From the article:

          The bad news is that the 6 GHz wireless spectrum uses shorter wavelengths. Short wavelengths are great for fast data transfers at close range, So, they’re great for connecting to your Wi-Fi 7-enabled HDTV a few feet away from your router

          With a range that short, you’re not going to be doing much roaming around. It obviously has some use cases, but unless you need to be streaming data it doesn’t make a lot of sense.

          The example we are discussing in this thread is transferring data off of a high res/high performance camera. For many situations this can be done after filming is completed, in which case a cord still makes a lot more sense. Hence my joke.

          For live broadcasting it could be useful, but the range still seems quite limiting.