"shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. " -14th amendment
notice how it doesn’t say “convicted of”
… furthermore, the legal definition of “insurrection and rebellion” and “seditious conspiracy” have an almost complete overlap.
im sorry you have failed to grasp basic logic, but you know what? there’s a lot of youtube videos on logic… you should check them out! it’s a great opportunity.
i recommend you dig into symbolic logic… pretty abstract but i think it helps intuitively
Literary definitions are irrelevant in the court of law.
"shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. " -14th amendment
notice how it doesn’t say “convicted of”
… furthermore, the legal definition of “insurrection and rebellion” and “seditious conspiracy” have an almost complete overlap.
im sorry you have failed to grasp basic logic, but you know what? there’s a lot of youtube videos on logic… you should check them out! it’s a great opportunity.
i recommend you dig into symbolic logic… pretty abstract but i think it helps intuitively