'100-200,000, not two million': Israel's finance minister envisions depopulated Gaza - eviltoast
  • shiveyarbles@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    The US is really fucked up on this. I mean Israel is a tactical ally, but how do you turn a blind eye to genocide?

    • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      10 months ago

      The US hasn’t turned a blind eye to it. The US has been exerting pressure for lessened combat operations since the getgo.

      Foreign policy is not about morality, it is about power.

      There are 3 main powers in that region. Saudi Arabia, Iran and Israel. Right now the US has a lot of influence over both (power). If the US were to just drop Israel, then all of a sudden the US has no more power in the region.

      The Israelis do not need us for weapons. Not only do they have their own military industrial complex, there are other 1st world powers who would happily sell arms to Israel for a chance to become the new most powerful influence in the region due to having Iran and Israel under their thumbs.

      I swear, Americans are fucking stupid when it comes to how anything works and they have zero desire to learn. It’s no wonder that the US ends up with people like trump.

      • shiveyarbles@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        If you continue to provide funding and weapons to an ongoing genocide, you are 100% complicit. What you are suggesting is that the ends justify the means.

        • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, we totally reined in their terror by giving them everything they wanted. Biden thinks if he is nice enough they will return in kind. He tends to use the same tactic when negotiating with Republicans 🤦‍♂️

            • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              10 months ago

              You talk about how foreign policy is about power and influence - I am saying Biden doesn’t understand how influence works as evidence by him not using his power to influence Israeli policy even though it is leading to a more volatile middle east and lower approval ratings at home. In other words, he is undermining his own influence. But go on and tell us how we’re children for expecting more.

              • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                10 months ago

                What power do you think he has? You do realize that the Israelis do not need to rely on us for military aid, correct? You also do realize that there are a couple other world powers who are not allied with the US who would be very happy to cozy up to Israel which means that they would have much more power and influence in the Middle East because at that point it would be Israel and Iran.

                I think you must be at least somewhat naive about just how right wing and authoritarian the Israeli government is.

                • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  If the US has no influence over Israel in regards to this conflict than that sounds like a critical policy failure and a huge geopolitical risk.

                  Edit: I’m curious what potential Israel allies you speak of that are not aligned with the US? Our own allies are distancing themselves from this clusterfuck.

        • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          10 months ago

          Say it with me. Foreign policy is about POWER, not morality. It is about power, influence, and power coupons.

          Jesus, it’s like talking to literal children.

            • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Having influence over something doesn’t mean that you control it. The US has exerted heavy influence to attempt to curb the worst of the Israeli impulses (full scale ground operations being one of the successful ones). But that does not mean that the US controls Israel.

              Israel is hell bent on repeating every mistake that the US made post 9/11. The latest is the equivalent of the “mission accomplished” banner.

              The next mistake(if they make it) is going to be expanding the scope of what they intend to do.

              • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                The argument is that we’re not using our strongest influence by virtue of not threatening to withhold arms (even though it would be in US interest to do so to preserve influence in the region). I am not arguing that the US controls Israel like some vassal state.

                • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Those arms you are talking about have already been appropriated by Congress, UNTIL 2028!!!

                  But I’m guessing that you didn’t know that because it’s a lot easier to sit on social media and wax eloquent about how foreign policy should mirror morality.

                  Even if we could stop the arms shit, it wouldn’t matter. Israel has it’s own military industrial complex and there are several other countries that would happily trade with Israel to give the US influence over the region a black eye.

                  Do you understand? Israel does not NEED our stuff. Sure it helps, but you seem to be under the delusion that if we didn’t supply weapons they wouldn’t have any. That is woefully naive and incorrect.

                  “But why do we give it???”

                  To which I repeat: Foreign policy is about power and power coupons, not morality. This is the way it is, not the way it should be. Kissinger was a soulless ghoul, but he understood exactly what foreign policy is all about (which is the main reason why most of us hated him with a fiery passion). Nixon should have ensured that he took a long stroll on the deck of a submerged submarine, but alas, missed opportunities.

                  Maybe one day foreign policy will resemble morality, but that day will not come for a very, very, long time. If ever.

                  • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    If we have so little influence over Israel than that undermines your argument that we’re getting “power coupons” in return. I’m not even debating you on the morality of Kissinger, I’m meeting you where you stand: if we don’t exercise our influence then we are going to lose it (and Kissinger agrees with me on that at least)

            • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              The United States seeks to maintain influence in the Middle East for several reasons, including geopolitical stability, economic interests, and regional security. The region is vital for global energy resources, and stability in the Middle East is crucial to prevent potential threats such as terrorism and the spread of extremism. Additionally, the U.S. maintains alliances with several countries in the region to promote shared interests and counterbalance regional powers.