Sure, but my question is more like “who are you that I should trust your perspective?” Particularly when you seem to admit having a bias towards a “doomer” perspective. Like, I wouldn’t want to take an article seriously when the title is “We need more police, and that’s okay” from theauthoritarian.com
‘Editorial style’ is not saying the government is faking COVID statistics. Laughable you can say ‘isnt science the authority here’ while dismissing blatant fear mongering and misinformation as ‘editorial style’, lmfao and you expect people to take you seriously
deleted by creator
Sure, but my question is more like “who are you that I should trust your perspective?” Particularly when you seem to admit having a bias towards a “doomer” perspective. Like, I wouldn’t want to take an article seriously when the title is “We need more police, and that’s okay” from theauthoritarian.com
It eventually turns into a full on conspiracy article about how the government is faking all the covid statistics. Garbage article and website.
.
It’s not a loaded question to ask “who are you and why should I trust you?”
.
Ok, Doomer
deleted by creator
Nice.
deleted by creator
‘Editorial style’ is not saying the government is faking COVID statistics. Laughable you can say ‘isnt science the authority here’ while dismissing blatant fear mongering and misinformation as ‘editorial style’, lmfao and you expect people to take you seriously
.
Yeah I’m laughing alright