produnis@discuss.tchncs.de to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agopeer reviewdiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up1499arrow-down16
arrow-up1493arrow-down1imagepeer reviewdiscuss.tchncs.deprodunis@discuss.tchncs.de to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square7fedilink
minus-squarelemming001@exploding-heads.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year agoThat’s what the process should be. In reality, especially in social sciences, it comes down to whether the “peer reviewers” agree with your point of view. Even if your point of view is bullshit and not backed up by science.
That’s what the process should be.
In reality, especially in social sciences, it comes down to whether the “peer reviewers” agree with your point of view. Even if your point of view is bullshit and not backed up by science.