Japan Decides That Copyright Doesn't Apply to AI Training - eviltoast
  • donuts@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You do realize individuals can train neural networks on their own hardware, right?

    Good luck training something that rivals big tech, especially now that they’re all putting “moats” around their data…

    We, the little people, don’t have the data, the storage, the processing power, the RAM, and least but not least, the cash, to compete with them.

    At any rate, if you train your NN using appropriately licensed or public domain data, more power to you. But if you feed a machine a bunch of other people’s writing, artwork, music, etc., please understand that you will never truly own the output.

    You seem to be imagining a future in which AI is the great equalizer that ushers us in to some kind of utopia, but right now I’m only seeing even more money, power and control being clawed away from the people in favor of the biggest, richest tech conglomerates. It’s fucking dystopian, and I hope people like you will recognize that before it’s really too late.

      • donuts@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        At any rate, if you train your NN using appropriately licensed or public domain data, more power to you. But if you feed a machine a bunch of other people’s writing, artwork, music, etc., please understand that you will never truly own the output.

        I am.

        It is only the profit maximizing hyper capitalists who intend to use AI to exploit workers and rip off artists. I have no problem with the technology behind AI, I just don’t think people should be using it as a tool for continual, industrialized mass exploitation of the little people (like you and me) who actually own the data that they put online.