41% of fediverse instances have blocked threads so far!!! - eviltoast
  • aroom@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    where did you see that the fedipact main purpose was to impose defederation? that would be rich.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      https://fedipact.online/ reads:

      “i am an instance admin/mod on the fediverse. by signing this pact, i hereby agree to block any instances owned by meta should they pop up on the fediverse. project92 is a real and serious threat to the health and longevity of fedi and must be fought back against at every possible opportunity”

      What goal do you think a pact like that has? Do you not think they want everyone else on board? Don’t waffle with some “will no one rid me of this troublesome priest” sophistry. They want Meta locked out.

      • aroom@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes and that’s their right.

        But thankfully they don’t impose anything to anyone. You had me worried for a minute.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Indeed, one of the great benefits of an open protocol like ActivityPub is that it’s impossible to force stuff like this. So ironically, they’re going to fail to impose their desired outcome for the same reason that they don’t need to impose their desired outcome.