Optional@lemmy.world to tumblr@lemmy.world · 2 months agoDon’t Be Itlemmy.worldimagemessage-square133linkfedilinkarrow-up11.3Karrow-down16
arrow-up11.3Karrow-down1imageDon’t Be Itlemmy.worldOptional@lemmy.world to tumblr@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square133linkfedilink
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoThey protect your privacy as much as a search engine can.
minus-squareraspberriesareyummy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoYou really need to step back and reevaluate.
minus-squareraspberriesareyummy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoIn this scenario: Your assessment of the reality of what “protecting people’s privacy” means.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoSome protection is better than none. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.
minus-squareraspberriesareyummy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoExcept using a search engine without login from a private browser window is better(!) protection by far.
minus-squareraspberriesareyummy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoWhich is, of course, something kagi couldn’t do… Right?
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoOf course they could, they don’t need to since you’re logged in, and they don’t have an incentive since you’re a paying customer, not the product.
They protect your privacy as much as a search engine can.
You really need to step back and reevaluate.
What exactly?
In this scenario: Your assessment of the reality of what “protecting people’s privacy” means.
Some protection is better than none. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.
Except using a search engine without login from a private browser window is better(!) protection by far.
Except fingerprinting
Which is, of course, something kagi couldn’t do… Right?
Of course they could, they don’t need to since you’re logged in, and they don’t have an incentive since you’re a paying customer, not the product.