There's a difference - eviltoast
  • Cethin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Well you used spices and things with flavor, so it’s not very British.

    • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      If you’re going to ignore the entirety of British-indian cuisine, then Americans really shouldn’t be calling Mexican food their tastiest creation.

    • Nacktmull@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Are you not aware that a British national dish is Chicken tikka masala?

      • soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Brit here. National dish is fish and chips or a roast, tikka masala is top 3 but not number 1.

        • Nacktmull@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Oh come on lad! I am defending you guys here and you have nothing better to do than back stabbing me?

          Also:

          Chicken Tikka Massala is now a true British national dish

          Robin Cook, British foreign minister, 2001

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Fish and chips is the other national dish, and the first one. While I like it, it isn’t exactly full of flavor.

        Classic British cuisine doesn’t really have spices, because the British Isles don’t really have too many foods that can be used as spices. Sure, once they colonized India, they got some spices, but even still classic British food mostly stayed the same.