Chris Remington@beehaw.org to Politics@beehaw.org · 11 months agoJack Smith asks Supreme Court to weigh Trump's immunity argumentwww.axios.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up127arrow-down10
arrow-up127arrow-down1external-linkJack Smith asks Supreme Court to weigh Trump's immunity argumentwww.axios.comChris Remington@beehaw.org to Politics@beehaw.org · 11 months agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squareMelody Fwygon@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoPersonally I would expect 2 or 3. Most likely 3, so they can appeal to sensibilities and say they plugged up the executive power loophole until an act of Congress modifies the constitution thusly.
minus-squareShhalahr@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months ago“This decision does not set a precedent.”
Personally I would expect 2 or 3. Most likely 3, so they can appeal to sensibilities and say they plugged up the executive power loophole until an act of Congress modifies the constitution thusly.
“This decision does not set a precedent.”