Unilever named ‘international sponsor of war’ by Ukraine - eviltoast
  • MercuryUprising@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah you mean Unilever, the company that was caught dumping mercury in a densely populated part of India? Or the same one responsible for deforestation of Indonesia and using a palm oil supplier that used child labor? Or perhaps the same Unilever that is one of the top 10 polluters on the planet, which lobbied in India and Philippines to prevent a law banning single use plastic? Or maybe the same Unilever that had salmonella contamination in their products and refused to release information about which product dates were affected? Or the Unilever that was accused of price fixing in Europe and was later fined for the practice? Or maybe the same Unilever that pressured Cosmo magazine to fire a Sri Lankan editor for refusing to promote their skin whiteners? Or maybe the same Unilever that ordered security to fire rubber bullets and pepper spray at striking workers in South America? The same Unilever whose founder used Belgium’s Congolese workers as forced laborers for nearly 40 years to create his empire (if you’re not sure why this is an issue, just look up Belgium’s exploits in Congo)?

    Oh, it’s all the same Unilever? The same criminal parasites that cooperated with an imperial empire to “employ” slaves that were being genocided doesn’t have any issue with doing business with a country that is using Imperialism to genocide another group of people today? Well color me shocked…

    • MercuryUprising@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Another thing you can do, if your hair isn’t naturally too oily, is to just wash it less frequently. I was my hair 2 times a week max these days and it honestly looks better than it ever did before. A small bottle of shampoo lasts me more than six months these days.

  • MxM111@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    From the article:

    “The company said that if it were to abandon its business and brands in Russia, “they would be appropriated – and then operated – by the Russian state”. Unilever said it had not been able to find a way to sell the business that “avoids the Russian state potentially gaining further benefit, and which safeguards our people”. It said in that light, continuing to run the business with “strict constraints” was the best option.”

    Of course they are making profits there. But I suspect if they simply exit, that those profits would be made by whoever takes the business. Which would be some of the Kremlin oligarchs. It is “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” situation.

    • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s just an excuse. You should never take corporate PR at their word. Especially if it boils down to “We have no choice but to continue making tons of money”.

      • MercuryUprising@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unilever created its empire using Congolese slave labor under Belgian control between 1911 and 1945. Genocide and human rights abuses are literally built into the foundation of the company. Don’t believe their bullshit PR speak.

  • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Awful, absolutely awful.

    I’ve bought a Dove product by accident sometime in the past, but it looks like the garbage they produce is easily avoidable alltogether.