Tired to search everytime an exchange to swap Monero ? - eviltoast

Hi guys, I run intercambio with OrangeFren and I wanted to do a very full presentation.

Intercambio is an exchange aggregator

If you’re tired to find liquidity providers, our front-end is doing it for you. Put an amount to swap and a monero address to receive, we will display the swap and sourcing it.

Intercambio is an exchange aggregator like many others, but focused on privacy

We do everything to keep users anonymous:

  • A Tor & I2P hidden-service access, without logging (IP, user-agent ect…) or JavaScript (the clearnet access is protected by Cloudflare so be sure to use the hidden services for this feature). Image
  • Never KYC filter, to ensure no KYC procedures because selected exchanges will not
We’re also doing good user experience and swap features.

We’re trying to mix privacy with utility and a easy-to-use interface:

  • Providing multi-hop swaps. If you can’t find a swap from a crypto to an other, we will split the swap (For example: ETH on BNB ➡️ LTC ➡️ XMR).
  • A Trade tab is available if you’re running bulk swaps to follow their status. Image
We’re featured on a lot of places !
We donate to projects building for privacy
  • obitor_xmr@monero.imOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    The Tails donation is going trough https://farside.link who’s aggregating Nitter instances, you also can access to farside and nitter instances over Tor so I dont get what you’re saying 🤔

    • Saki@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      We have uBlock Origin on Tails, not just Tor. If you were on Tails, you’d know a working Nitter instance.

      PS.

      1. When a random instance is randomly called, the instance might be behind CloudFlare, which wants to “scan” Tor Browser, saying “One moment please…” (TB users know this too well.)
      2. While this is annoying and time-wasting, if you’re using a vanilla version of TB, chances are they’ll let you go.
      3. On Tails, however, we have uBO, so fingerprints are different. This sometimes causes an infinite loop of “One moment please…” perhaps b/c uBO blocks CF scanning scripts.
      4. Because of this, and because CF is everywhere nowadays, when something doesn’t work on TB on Tails, the first thing a user might say is “We have uBO.” Hope this makes sense! And sorry, I was not clear enough.
      • obitor_xmr@monero.imOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes theres uBlock, and ? You can use intercambio or nitter with the most strict uBlock settings, without problems because theres no tracking content. I don’t get your point 🤷‍♂️

          • obitor_xmr@monero.imOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            That’s a redirector, maybe a specific instance is down or having a specific policy but farside can redirect you to an other one. In case you dont understood, I put farside to be sure someone gets a up instance, some of used instances got hidden-services. If I had put one specific instance it could end down.

            • Saki@monero.town
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’ll accept that you’re saying you did this out of good will. So you too can accept that the results were not necessarily ideal, as many instances are not (or no longer) exactly Tor-friendly.

              When talking to Tails users next time, you might want to consider nitter.oksocial.net (officially used by EFF too)

              • obitor_xmr@monero.imOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I tested the instance you shown without problem, you more likely got a node abused many times because cleaner ones haves no problem