White House threatens to veto anti-EV bill just passed by US House - eviltoast
  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, because the grid is rapidly decarbonizing, while old cars literally can’t. Remember that solar is currently the cheapest energy production infrastructure to build now, which means there’s a huge economic incentive to change to a more renewable energy grid.

    Also I hate the “batteries cause waste” argument because it always conveniently ignores the fact that fossil fuel-based systems already cause similar, massive environmental destruction during mining and disposal.

    • BigWheelPowerBrakeSlider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wasn’t arguing. I’m all for doing everything we can to minimize the damage we have done and continue to do. But they do cause waste. And as I’m no chemical engineer, and the technology has not been around long enough on a big enough scale that I’ve come across much about the issue, I just don’t know how bad that waste is, especially in comparison to waste produced by what we’re doing now. Hence why I asked the question. Otherwise, your explanation is helpful and I thank you.

      • UristMcHolland@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        After batteries are used up in EV’s they still have a usable lifespan in grid energy storage systems. Then after their useful life there, they can still be recycled.

        The grid “not being able to handle EVs” is a farce.