Left wing perspective over cultural revolution, (a larger perspective on the) full story, good and bad. Nice primer for all of us. :)
Edit: Also, not necessarily “the full story”, or the best of implied judgement by the author. Remember your own theory when listening to other people’s edition of historical events.
Edit: I just replaced the link with a react from hasanabi, which we generally trust better.
Original: https://youtu.be/8jEMlFCaI04 React: https://youtu.be/w9xz-gwDXkI
Yeah but that’s where the danger lies, when you have nothing on a subject you are not fighting the bias of the first information, if your first information is skewed towards a reformist mindset or what have you(the kind of vibes I got from him) its harder to replace, I do believe the guy has some good sources and some commitment to being honest, and that’s nice that you’ve got into some sources, but to realize that he drinks at least a bit from the anti revolutionary cool aid can be healthy to be watchful when the guy puts his reading of the facts on the video
AES Is actual existing socialism, usually refering to Cuba, DRPK, Laos, Vietnam and depending on who you ask China goes there too, but at the time of the events covered on the video it would absolutely be part of the AES
Edit: His reluctance of calling revisionists revisionists is quite interesting in the video, and the fact that he gives too much weight to the idea that Mao was fostering free speech to his own gain, when if you look at the whole history of the Mao’s revolution he was about the power going to the people from day one. Furthermore, even by the events he himself claims, the issue of the cultural revolution was not the revolution itself, but the reaction of the revisionists against it, which show two things, the first that Mao was right to call forth such revolution, and second that the revisionists were indeed revisionists, since they believe that their vision stands above the will of the people which is absolutely anti communist.
What I got as an interesting takeaway though is the fact that intellectuals were scapegoats from both sides, an I can see it and it stands as a cautionary tale to us all, one thing that make intellectuals easy targets of the anger of the people, is the elitist stance many hold, about their degrees and Phds and such. The academic circle often stands in a marble tower as far as the people are concerned and we need to always bear that in mind, with the intent to minimize or even, if possible, erase such distance from the intellectual revolutionary and the people of which the revolution will be comprised of, when it comes to be.
I can only thank you for the depth of your analysis and how far you went into the video to make these clarifications.
If you have any suggestions on the topic, send it through and we can add it ot the top post. :)
Found this on the wonderful work of comrade Dessalines, under socialism FAQ, can be a start, I highly encourage you to dive into wherever your interest guides you in the Dessalines page, that is a magnificent gift he brought all the community, it’s a hell of a job
A Reddit link was detected in your comment. Here are links to the same location on Teddit and Libreddit, which are Reddit frontends that protect your privacy.