DeSantis challenges Trump: 'Why are you running?' - eviltoast

I didn’t vote for Trump in 2016. I didn’t vote.

In 2020 I voted for Trump because knew Biden would be bad. He has done better than I expected but the inflation is killing me and the focus on the wrong thing isn’t helping.

Early on I was a De Santis fan but my interest has waned as he has taken hard stances on things that need compromise.

  • crashfrog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Cite the law that gives the federal authority to take control form the states.

    USC 42 § 243

    Sure, show me the vaccines.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3371787/

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7172901/

    https://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/public/vaccination_qa_pub.htm

    Any other dumbshit questions?

    you claim to be an expert but keep making claims that are false.

    If they’re “false” how are you so completely failing to refute them?

    • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Any other dumbshit questions?

      Let’s keep it civil at the least. Because I don’t think most people could cite the law that gives the federal government authority to take control from the states. Don’t use your knowledge to browbeat people.

      • crashfrog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Because I don’t think most people could cite the law that gives the federal government authority to take control from the states.

        Right, but I did.

        • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Exactly. And I’m asking you not to criticize someone for being ignorant that such a law exists and can’t cite it. That’s all.

          Otherwise, keep on keepin’ on.

          • crashfrog@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            And I’m asking you not to criticize someone for being ignorant that such a law exists

            That wasn’t the criticism that I made. The “dumbass question” was “show me vaccines for infectious diseases that aren’t COVID-19.” But there are many such, and nearly everyone has received several from time to time. The flu vaccine, even!

      • crashfrog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        No where in that law is authority taken away from the state’s.

        I didn’t say that it does. What it does is grant overriding authority to the Secretary take whatever actions are in the interests of public health under the condition that there’s a public health emergency. States retain their authority but the Federal government has superseding authority because it’s the Federal government.

        Where does that law give federal government authority to take control from the states?

        It’s in the exact part you quoted - “the Secretary may take such actions to implement” a plan of control of any disease or condition, or to end any public health emergency or problem.

          • crashfrog@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            No where in the law is the secretary granted authority to take whatever actions are in the interest of public health.

            It feels like you’re missing a pretty important predicate, and as a result you’re totally misrepresenting what I just said. Go back and read it again - a public health emergency is a particular thing and justifies more legal authority than is normally allowed.

            You forgot the 2nd half which limits those plans and actions to personal, equipment, and medical supplies under the jurisdiction of the secretary.

            Well, yes. The Secretary can tell people what to do and the Secretary can access necessary resources. That’s more or less totally comprehensive of the scope of government power - distribute things and give orders. Were it possible to wave a magic wand and have disease disappear, that power would be enumerated for the Secretary during a public health emergency too.

            State hospitals, private hospitals, and their employees do not fall under the jurisdiction of the secretary of HHS.

            The text of the law you quoted brings them under the authority of HHS in a state of public health emergency.

              • crashfrog@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                There is nothing in that law that gives federal authority to take control from the states

                Technically the government isn’t “taking control from the states” when it uses its superior authority in a public health emergency; the states are still in control, they’re just being directed by the Federal government. They don’t lose authority; it just becomes subordinate to Federal authority. That’s what’s authorized by USC 42 § 243.

                The law you cited says HHS secretary can tell HHS employees what to do, and access HHS resources.

                No, it’s not so limited.

                Could you provide the text where it says that?

                You already have. I can’t make you read it, though.

                  • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    I’ve read USC 42 § 243 multiple times, I honestly don’t see which part of USC 42 § 243 grants HHS authority to direct/control the states response.

                    It gives them the power to advise and give states help if asked.

                    Otherwise, we wouldn’t have had 50 different plans for COVID. The federal government would have enforced one plan but as I cited previously, even Biden admits that isn’t a power the federal government has.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        No where in that law is authority taken away from the state’s. Where does that law give federal government authority to take control from the states?

        It doesn’t. If you read down further, you will see the law is about ports of entry.

        The states run their one pandemic show. It’s why we have all the different rules. In parts of Missouri no masks were required. In other areas masks were required. Ironically, the areas without masks did better than those with masks.

        Chicago required masks when you were outside. Oregon the same, most other states did not.

        I think people didn’t see COVID as a threat like the Democrats wanted them to see it. That is why people pushed back.

        Had it been an Ebola outbreak on the same scale, I think people would have tried to be compliant.

        When you look at the mortality rate of COVID, it was tiny. If you caught it, the chances of you dying were very slim unless you were old or had other medical issues.

        Personally, I ignored everything Faucci said and stuck with my training. I didn’t catch COVID until last year; it was a minor case.

          • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            I could talk this topic for days since I was in the middle of it. One big issue was blue states screaming for more aid that they didn’t need. Centers were setup to handle overflow and for the most part weren’t needed and weren’t used. So we diverted money and resources away from other things to do this when it wasn’t even needed.

            One of my favorite stories was in Italy. They used bubble helmets and ED medication as treatment. Just weird to imagine people in bed with helmets on and erections. The ED medicine made sense. Just a weird image.

            Faucci pushed fear and not good decisions. He did some of our briefings and nobody agreed with him but we have to be quiet. The guy was clearly intoxicated by his power.

            I’m not opposed to wearing mask. I’m opposed to pretending they’ll make a difference. Cloth, surgical mask have almost zero benefit. N95 have some benefit but they’re not magical. I encourage people to wear them because it’s better than nothing but all the lies that it’ll end the pandemic or save grandma were fear mongering which I feel id disgusting.

            Yeah I don’t think he realized it’s pretty common knowledge the states run pandemics and the federal government plays a supporting role. I think it’s a crap model but in Covid I think it saved lives. We’d still be in lockdown if fauci could have forced it.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      SARS and mers were never an issue. As you are aware mers was never even used in the Middle East since it vanished before it could be trialed. My trip was cancelled for that reason. There was nothing to test.

      Did you actually read the law? It states exactly what I said.

      The feds provide assistance. They do not control it. That’s done at a state level. It’s why each state had different rules and the feds couldn’t do anything about it. They could only out rules on trains/planes and federal facilities.

      It’s why Florida had lax rules and New York had strict rules.

      It’s why I wa recalled since this is what I did for twenty years in the army as a medical officer.

      • crashfrog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Did you actually read the law?

        Did you? It empowers the Federal government to take steps to control outbreaks of infectious disease, and to take other measures supportive of public health, and delegates these powers to the particular Federal agencies that have this responsibility including the Public Health Service.

        SARS and mers were never an issue.

        Yes, that’s my point. That’s what successful interdiction of infectious disease looks like. Prevention is 9/10ths of a cure, remember?

        It’s why I wa recalled since this is what I did for twenty years in the army as a medical officer.

        When you worked as a medical officer in the Army were you required to have state involvement to treat a patient? No, right? Was your medical license issued by any US state? Not until you left the Army, right?

        The Federal government has its own public health authority, and that authority had been successfully used by previous Presidents to prevent infectious pandemics. Trump failed to follow suit because he was a totally incompetent executive, which I’ve proved and you no longer even attempt to dispute.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Did you? It empowers the Federal government to take steps to control outbreaks of infectious disease, and to take other measures supportive of public health, and delegates these powers to the particular Federal agencies that have this responsibility including the Public Health Service

          It allows them to advise the states. That isn’t authority over a pandemic. That isn’t even close. If you worked in the field you’d know the states have the authority. The Feds can’t force action on states. That’s why Trump never did.

          When you worked as a medical officer in the Army were you required to have state involvement to treat a patient? No, right? Was your medical license issued by any US state? Not until you left the Army, right

          Yes my medical license was issued by a state. All medical personal in the army have to have a state license. It just doesn’t have to be from the state they are in. The federal government doesn’t issue medical licenses.

          The Federal government has its own public health authority, and that authority had been successfully used by previous Presidents to prevent infectious pandemics

          Mers died out in its own. The flu expanded and died out natural. It’s what they do.

          I was going to deploy for the Mers vaccine and then it was all cancelled because it went away.

          I think you are trying to give the federal government authority they don’t have. They just don’t.

          Now maybe we will agree on this. I think the federal government should have the authority to set a standard. 50 states and x number of territories doing their own thing is stupid when people can easily cross the border. Back in the day I lived less than from a mile from another state. If I walked a block I was in another state. Hypothetically they could have the exact opposite rules. That’s stupid.

          I’m all for state rights but once it’s on a pandemic level. The Feds should have authority.

          Maybe you know this but the government can force to vaccinate but that’s a slippery slope. During the revolution they use the army to force quarantine. I don’t know it being done since and while I don’t like the idea of it, I do think in a serious pandemic it should be considered. COVID to me wasn’t the test case for it.

          • crashfrog@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            allows them to advise the states. That isn’t authority over a pandemic. That isn’t even close.

            You’re either not willing or not able to read the law. Here’s a little primer to assist your comprehension:

            https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7152008/

            The federal government doesn’t issue medical licenses.

            The Federal government issues medical licenses to doctors in the District of Columbia because the District of Columbia is under Federal jurisdiction.

            Mers died out in its own.

            MERS died out because of rapid, responsive public health action. It wasn’t “on its own”; public health successfully prevented a MERS pandemic.

            I think you are trying to give the federal government authority they don’t have. They just don’t.

            They just do, though.

            COVID to me wasn’t the test case for it.

            Yes, it wasn’t any sort of “test case” except a test for the competence of Donald Trump to respond to a public health crisis, and the result of that test was millions of Americans dead and the loss of the most jobs since the Great Depression. He failed, due to his incompetence. Now you’re arguing an unrelated point about what the appropriate scope of Federal power is, but that’s an unrelated topic; Trump already had these powers, he just was incompetent as using them, as he’s always been incompetent at using power. That’s why he loses so often.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              You’re either not willing or not able to read the law

              I am familiar with the law. Nothing in the law gives the Feds to force measures on the states. That’s why Biden tried to use osha laws. Maybe we are talking past each other. Do you think the cdc has authority to force masks on the population of a state?

              The Federal government issues medical licenses to doctors in the District of Columbia because the District of Columbia is under Federal jurisdiction.

              It’s under its own jurisdiction. It’s not a state. I’ve never seen a federal medical license and my girlfriend handled medical licenses for a state. She said she’s never seen a federal medical license. They’re all state issued. That’s how we met is she processed my medical license when I switched states. Though we didn’t date to many years later.

              Trump already had these powers

              He did not. Biden publicly acknowledged he didn’t have those rights either. An expert In the field would know only the states have those rights.

              426 is about ports of entry.

              https://www.cdc.gov/quarantine/aboutlawsregulationsquarantineisolation.html

              measures to prevent the entry and spread of communicable diseases from foreign countries into the United States and between states

              States have police power functions to protect the health, safety, and welfare of persons within their borders. To control the spread of disease within their borders, states have laws to enforce the use of isolation and quarantine.

              States have the power within their borders. It’s exactly why Biden didn’t do anything. It’s why he tried to use osha instead which was an obvious no no.

              • crashfrog@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                I am familiar with the law.

                You’d never even heard of it before I cited it.

                She said she’s never seen a federal medical license.

                “You wouldn’t know her, though; she goes to a different high school. Uh, in Canada.”

                He did not. Biden publicly acknowledged he didn’t have those rights either.

                What “rights”? I’m talking about the rights used under the Obama administration to address the challenge of three different incipient pandemics. Trump didn’t lose those rights in the interim; he had them and just didn’t competently use them.

                426 is about ports of entry.

                I didn’t reference 426.

                To control the spread of disease within their borders, states have laws to enforce the use of isolation and quarantine.

                COVID-19 didn’t originate within the borders of any US state. It originated in Wuhan, China, and was allowed to spread into the United States by Trump’s incompetence at using powers you now admit he had.

                It’s exactly why Biden didn’t do anything.

                But Biden did do things. Did monkeypox become a national pandemic? Did pediatric RSV?

                No, right? “New pandemic just dropped” is kind of a social media joke, but the thing is, they keep not being pandemics. You think Trump just got unlucky with COVID-19, but it wasn’t particularly infectious - R0 of around 1.5, barely replacement level, whereas the R0 of SARS-1 was double that. Trump was just particularly incompetent and fumbled the prevention of an entirely preventable pandemic. He failed a test that Biden’s already passed, twice over, in his current administration and passed three times in Obama’s. Trump is just an incompetent loser; he always has been.

    • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      USC 42 § 243

      Funny how you have to resort to citing blatant garbage that far exceeds the constitutionally granted powers of the federal government.

      • crashfrog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Funny how you have to resort to citing blatant garbage

        Lol, what I cited was the US Code, but I’m sure you’ve never heard of it.

        that far exceeds the constitutionally granted powers of the federal government.

        Take it up with the Supreme Court, loser