You don't need JavaScript for that - HTMHell - eviltoast
    • silas@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Do you have to manually approve every single script, even if it’s from the same origin as the site you’re visiting?

      • neosheo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Idk about librefox but with noscript you manually approve ALL scripts even same origin. However you dont need to do a temporary trust for them all. For sites you trust and frequent you can just trust them so it allows them to run everytime

        • I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It also comes default with the google ajax server always trusted, and the google analytics server untrusted.

          I’m trying to shop on Luxe Bidet, and it’s trying to load 26 different scripts. Everything that the scripts are doing, should be done in HTML/CSS instead as the article suggests. Going to a different page shouldn’t be an onClick event, it should be an HTML link. Loading images shouldn’t break with JS disabled, it should be an HTML image element.

          I get that JS has it’s place, but if I can’t even navigate your site without testing 26 different scripts to see which one is breaking the site, I’m going to a different site.