Switching to more privacy friendly alternatives - eviltoast

How have others gotten friends/family to make the switch? I’ve been doing a cleanup of my digital life over the last year or so and am trying to move to using more privacy friendly alternatives where possible.

example: I’d love to switch to Signal only but everyone I know only uses WhatsApp. I’ve mentioned switching to people in the past but it’s always the same response (I don’t have anything to hide)

  • kpw@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sorry but I’ve been burned by WhatsApp before. Not wasting time on moving my contacts to another walled garden again. XMPP is actively developed and has most privacy features Signal does + most providers don’t require a phone number and let you connect over Tor. Doing things properly and in an interoperable way takes more time but is absolutely worth it: https://snikket.org/blog/products-vs-protocols/

      • kpw@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can check how often you want, it’s not going to affect anyone. Please don’t check more than 5 times a second maybe.

          • kpw@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Great. I’ll check if Signal is compatible with any internet standards too. I’ll tag you to celebrate a decade without interoperability.

              • kpw@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Interoperability and standardization is not just a virtue, it is a necessary condition for sustainability. Unlike Signal, modern XMPP implementations have great privacy properties AND great sustainability properties.

                Matrix is a much better choice than Signal since it offers provider choice, but I wouldn’t be sure it’s any better than XMPP in terms of usability or sustainability:

                  • kpw@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    It doesn’t clash at all. If startups keep re-inventing the wheel just to have shiny things to sell investors on we end up with fragmentation which is terrible for interoperability. For example it’s impossible to send an encrypted message to a Matrix user using any XMPP client, since Matrix bridges can’t handle end-to-end encryption. Why? Because the company behind Matrix just had to cook up their own protocol instead of building on (and thus improving) existing internet standards. This is bad for interoperability and privacy.

                    You also seem to have trouble understanding that there can be multiple factors at play, not just a single one. I’m not arguing just privacy or just interoperability, but a combination. XMPP performs well in both while Signal performs slightly better in the first one while completely failing the second one.

          • kpw@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You care a lot about standardization of OMEMO, yet you don’t apply the same to Signal which contributes exactly nothing to any standards body.