'Cuts and be angry, that's not Canada': Trudeau goes hard at Poilievre at Ontario housing event - eviltoast

Less than a week after naming his new cabinet vowing a renewed focus on the concerns of Canadians, the one name Prime Minister Justin Trudeau couldn’t keep out of his mouth on Monday was Pierre Poilievre. At a housing announcement Trudeau brought the Conservative leader up multiple times, from panning his policy proposals, to his leadership style.

  • Oderus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bitcoin Milhouse voted against helping all Canadians, again, just to spite Justin Trudeau.

    The prime minister criticized Poilievre for opposing the new federal dental care program. Trudeau said that program has allowed hundreds of thousands of families to send their children to the dentist for the first time.

    “He chose to vote against, and to stand against and try to block … in the House, the delivering of dental care for vulnerable Canadians,” Trudeau said. “Why would you do that?”

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-trudeau-anger-fear-cuts-1.6923410

    • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Also:

      “That’s not Canada. That’s not how we build a stronger future. That’s not how we’ve gotten through the challenging times we’ve had in the past.”

      I agree.

      Now do something about housing, inflation, and the CRTC please.

      • undercrust@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Inflation isn’t something that anyone really gets to “do anything” about. The most successful applied economic model to explain inflation boils down to “when people start talking en masse about expecting inflation, companies take that as license to raise prices.” Every other economic model fails to reliably explain, predict, or resolve inflation, including the most popular - changes in interest rates.

      • Oderus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Now do something about housing, inflation, and the CRTC please.

        Such as? Inflation is already down to 2.8% which is in the range the BoC follows.

      • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Housing is a provincial issue, there’s very little the federal government can do about it.

        • girlfreddy@mastodon.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          @Tavarin @Mongostein

          The feds can legally purchase apartment blocks in any city and operate them as low income housing.

          They can do something about it … the feds just don’t want to become landlords because it’s complicated.

          Real leadership would recognize that leaving it up to provincial/municipal money-hungry airheads is just passing the buck.

          • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            They have virtually no way to control supply, they don’t control zoning, don’t control infrastructure. Even if they buy up some apartments, which they would need to convince people to sell, it would be a tiny drop in the housing problem bucket.

            If we want housing solved we need to do it at the provincial and municipal levels, and stop electing conservatives in at those levels.

            • girlfreddy@mastodon.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              @Tavarin

              Winnipeg, like Montreal, etc, has a ton of older apartment blocks (or 3 story walk-ups in Montreal) that need no rezoning or increased infrastructure. Purchasing a few of those in strategic areas would help to bring down rents.

              There are a ton of options available, and since municipal/provincial gov’ts aren’t doing anything the feds need to step up to the plate.

              • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                And people already live there, the government would have to ask them to sell. There aren’t a bunch of empty unowned blocks for the federal government to buy, and they can’t force the legal owners to sell.