If it wasn't in an encyclopedia, you just trusted word of mouth. - eviltoast
  • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You have a valid point but your conclusion is weak. Libraries aren’t pointless for research just because you have anecdotal evidence of bad experiences where they could have been just a shitty person, dumb person, having a really bad day, in a rush to get home to relieve a babysitter… etc, like that’s just human nature shit.

    Edit: sorry my tone came off WAY too strong and aggressive. I didn’t mean it like that.

    • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just think milage will vary a lot more with libraries than the internet, affluent areas tend to have better libraries and better staff which I think can cause a bias in how we think about things. The internet has been an absolute game changer for impoverished areas, especially being available on a fifty dollar tablet or second hand smart phone.

      And that’s before you even consider how huge it’s been for under-developed areas, I spoke to a guy from Ghana whos school has about a dozen old textbooks when he went there and now his son plays Minecraft and studies with the same resources and tools we use in the UK.