I’m sick of streaming. Films were better on Blu-ray - eviltoast

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/4954415

The digital world, I’m realising, is a bit of a racket. Recently most of my iTunes library disappeared from my iPhone, and I just don’t know if I can be bothered to go through all the different hoops, portals, queueing systems and long forgotten passwords to get them back again. I’ve also had the repeated experience of trying to view a film I’ve downloaded on Amazon, only to get that little square in the middle of the screen telling me that the player’s having issues at the moment, and would I, could I try again later? Meanwhile, the CDs and DVDs reproach me from my shelves like an abandoned spouse. ‘We were once your rock,’ they remind me, ‘And you traded us for tech-tinsel, a piece of cyber-skirt. How are you feeling now?’

I feel what I’ve always felt – that DVDs and Blu-rays were the summit of the film-lovers’ experience, and that progress should have stopped forever after that. Perhaps downloads or streamable films can have the picture quality of a Blu-ray (someone will doubtless tell me they do), but works of art should produce an artefact, something you can hold in your hand and own.

So my Blu-ray collecting goes on, but it’s strictly finite. I don’t want any film I don’t actually love (this rules out the collected Tarkovsky or Bergman, things I’d like to think of myself as liking rather than actually wanting to watch). My ambitions in fact are modest: the middle period works of Woody Allen (they’re about £25 a piece and should be), the odd Hollywood classic (the more technicolour the better) and some of those gritty 1960s northern films (the kind Morrissey purloined for his album covers) starring Tom Courtenay and Rita Tushingham. Then, barring the odd hiccup, I’m done.

Archive link

  • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    there is a way to have benefits of owning media like with bluray as well as the convenience of streaming, piracy.

    but works of art should produce an artefact, something you can hold in your hand and own.

    when you go to a movie theater you don’t get anything tangible either (other than tickets ig).

    • Norgur@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Besides, the “work of art” you are holding in your hand is not the movie itself, is it? Yes, technically you can “touch the movie” and smear your grimy fingers all over the back of the disc, but that’s not what collectors are referring to methinks. They are referring to a cheapo printout of a coverar inside an equally as cheapo disc case. It’s not “holding art in your hands” if your subscription-locked HP printer can ooze the exact same thing on a piece of paper…