The Feds' Vehicle 'Kill Switch' Mandate Is a Gross (and Dangerous) Violation of Privacy | Jon Miltimore - eviltoast

I know I posted about this yesterday, but this article does a much better job than I can.

  • TJD@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a device in my car from my car insurance company to monitor my driving

    Lmao, checks out that you’re just welcoming in the surveillance stare with open arms

    • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      My car company is not a part of the state, and I am cheap ass. I am a good driver and I want my insurance rates to reflect that.

      • TJD@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get good insurance rates, and I told them to stuff it when they “offered” to spy on me wherever i go.

        And lmao that you actually think “good driving” and “driving favored by insurance actuaries” are even remotely the same.

        • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          you actually think “good driving” and “driving favored by insurance actuaries” are even remotely the same.

          I never said they are the same. But there is enough overlap to get me a decent discount.

          • TJD@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Unless you just had your rates in the absolute shitter beforehand, you have very low standards for what a decent discount is, especially when you consider that you’re normalizing them taking an overwhelming amount of data about you to create future insurance profiles for everyone.