Is there any reason to use CAT 6A over 6 if the lengths are < 55m? - eviltoast

Under 55m, cat 6 should be equivalent to cat 6a. Is there any reason to still go with 6a? Are there differences from POE perspective?

  • richms@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Only reason is if they manage to get a 25gig or something (like we got 2.5 and 5 over cat5e) that works over 6a in the future. But buying for future possibilities is foolish.

    • Supergrunged@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You say this, like I haven’t wired houses with Fiber for future LOL! Is it worth it? Not right now. But we’ll see what time tells.

      • AffectionateJump7896@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The way to future proof is a conduit, so that you can pull through whatever gets invented in 20 or years time and your cat 6 is obsolete.

        Trying to second guess that cat 6A might be able to support some 25GB future standard is a fools errand. In the OPs situation, install cat 6 in conduit and if you need to pull through something else in 20 years it’ll be an easy job.

        • 2000BC_Economist@alien.topOPB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Agreed. There are conduits everywhere. Ceiling conduits for connecting to the rooms. Under floor conduit to put cables outside. Once outside we’ll just dig or put the cables by the wall.